|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Summary of environmental impacts |
|||||||||||
FISH
CommunitiesThe fish community has been
studied at a number of outfalls in NSW. The two most sensitive species
appear to be the eastern hula fish (Trachinops
taeniatus) and rock cale (Crinodus
lophodon). Decreases in the abundance of hula fish have been
observed near Boulder Bay, Bellambi and Port Kembla outfalls (Smith et
al 1998, TEL 1994). Decreases in the abundance of rock cale have been
observed near Vaucluse and Warriewood outfalls, however, an increase
(relative to reference locations) in the abundance of rock cale was
recorded at Port Kembla outfall (Lincoln-Smith 1985, TEL 1994). No
effect on fish communities were found at Penguin Head and Plantation
Point outfall and only localised differences at Forster outfall. A number of significant and
sustained impacts on the demersal fish communities were attributed to
the commissioning of the Malabar, North Head and Bondi deepwater
outfalls (EPA 1996e). Contaminant LoadsContaminant loads in fish (and a
number of invertebrate species) have been undertaken at many NSW
outfalls. Sydney’s inshore sewage outfalls were significant
contributors to organochlorine contamination of inshore sedentary fish
such as red morwong (Cheilodactylus
fuscus). Diversion of sewage to deepwater outfalls resulted in a
marked decline in organochlorine compounds in these fish. Apart from
lead, similar trends did not occur for concentrations of trace metals.
There was no observed increase in the contamination of offshore fish
species when the outfalls were diverted offshore (Krogh and Scanes
1996). This may be a result of improved source control, decreased usage
of organochlorine pesticides and greater dilution of sewage effluent at
the deep ocean outfall sites. A number of fish had relatively high
levels in Newcastle waters in the late 1980s (Cole 1990). However, the
majority of recent studies into contaminants in fish close to NSW
outfalls have often failed to find any organochlorine contaminants or
found these contaminants at levels well below National Food Authority
(Anon 1992) guideline levels for the protection of human consumers of
fish and other aquatic organisms. One of the major problems with
contaminant in fish studies is the mobility of fish species and the
potential for fish to move between ‘control’ and ‘impact’
locations. Other problems are associated with the reproductive status of
fish where fat (and possibly contaminants) may be shifted from the body
to the reproductive organs during breeding. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(Impac_5) Last updated May 2000 |
|||||||||||